Evaluation of molecular diagnostic assays in comparison with acid fast staining for detection of tuberculosis in patients attending a tertiary care hospital, Uttarakhand.
Abstract
Background: Acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy has limited sensitivity at low bacillary burden. Cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification testing (CBNAAT) detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) directly and provides rifampicin-resistance information.
Aim: To compare AFB microscopy with CBNAAT for TB detection in clinical specimens at a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand.
Materials and methods: This specimen-based cross-sectional study included 304 specimens from 3,160 specimens received for presumptive TB evaluation during December 2025 to August 2026. AFB microscopy and CBNAAT (GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra) were compared in specimens, where both results were available. Molecular-load and rifampicin-resistance results were analyzed among CBNAAT-detected specimens.
Results: Of 304 specimens, 217 (71.4%) were respiratory and rest 87 (28.6%) were non-respiratory. AFB stain was positive for 92 and negative for 163specimens. CBNAAT detected MTB in 301 specimens; 3 were not detected and were reported as NTM. Among 255 specimens with both results, 163 (63.9%) were AFB-negative/CBNAAT-detected. AFB positivity increased from 0/14 (Trace) to 37/39 (High) across molecular-load categories (P < 0.001). Rifampicin resistance was detected in 13/274 determinate results (4.7%).
Conclusion: CBNAAT detected MTB in many AFB-negative specimens, while AFB positivity increased with molecular load. These findings describe concordance and discordance in the studied specimen set rather than diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords:
Tuberculosis, AFB microscopy, CBNAAT, GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra, molecular load, rifampicin resistanceDOI
https://doi.org/10.37022/wjcmpr.v8i3.433References
1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025.
2. Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, Hopewell PC, Ramsay A, Cunningham J, et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(9):570–81. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70578-3.
3. World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 3: diagnosis – rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection, third edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.
4. Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, Nicol MP, Shenai S, Krapp F, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(11):1005–15. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0907847.
5. Horne DJ, Kohli M, Zifodya JS, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, Tollefson D, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;6:CD009593. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub4.
6. Kohli M, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, Yao M, Dheda K, Denkinger CM, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF assays for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;1:CD012768. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012768.pub3.
7. Helb D, Jones M, Story E, Boehme C, Wallace E, Ho K, et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance by use of on-demand, near-patient technology. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(1):229–37. doi:10.1128/JCM.01463-09.
8. Chakravorty S, Simmons AM, Rowneki M, Parmar H, Cao Y, Ryan J, et al. The new Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: improving detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin in an assay suitable for point-of-care testing. mBio. 2017;8(4):e00812-17. doi:10.1128/mBio.00812-17.
9. Dorman SE, Schumacher SG, Alland D, Nabeta P, Armstrong DT, King B, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: a prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):76–84. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30691-6.
10. Mishra H, Reeve R, Palmer Z, Caldwell J, Dolby T, Naidoo C, et al. Xpert Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis diagnosis in an HIV-endemic setting with a high burden of previous tuberculosis: a two-cohort diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):368–82. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30370-4.
11. Blakemore R, Nabeta P, Davidow AL, Vadwai V, Tahirli R, Munsamy V, et al. A multisite assessment of the quantitative capabilities of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(9):1076–84. doi:10.1164/rccm.201103-0536OC.
12. Denkinger CM, Schumacher SG, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N, Pai M, Steingart KR. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(2):435–46. doi:10.1183/09031936.00007814.
13. Sharma SK, Kohli M, Chaubey J, Yadav RN, Sharma R, Singh BK, et al. Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performance in diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis among adults in a tertiary care centre in India. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(4):1090–3. doi:10.1183/09031936.00059014.
14. Sharma SK, Ryan H, Khaparde S, Sachdeva KS, Singh AD, Mohan A, et al. Index-TB guidelines: guidelines on extrapulmonary tuberculosis for India. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145(4):448–63. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1950_16.
15. Mathur RB, Shukla US, Bindal HK. Role of cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test to diagnose tuberculosis at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Rajasthan, India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7(11):4243–8. doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20195000.
16. Chopra V, Virk BS, Chopra S, Bansal M, Chungath J. Application of CBNAAT (Xpert MTB/RIF assay) in new smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2020;90(2):1146. doi:10.4081/monaldi.2020.1146.
Published
Abstract Display: 0
PDF Downloads: 0 How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
