A STUDY ON THE ROLE OF SOCIOECONOMIC AND EDUCATIONAL FACTORS IN CANCER PREVENTION, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OUTCOMES.
Abstract
Cancer comprises a broad group of diseases characterised by uncontrolled cell growth with the potential to invade surrounding tissues and metastasise to distant organs, making it a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Globally, cancer accounts for approximately 9.6 million deaths annually, ranking as the second leading cause of death. This study aims to explore and analyse the impact of socioeconomic and educational factors on cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment acceptance, and overall patient outcomes. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered to cancer patients, capturing demographic variables such as age, gender, education level, income, employment status, and access to healthcare, along with information on prevention practices, diagnostic experiences, treatment acceptance, and clinical outcomes. The questionnaire also assessed health literacy, participation in screening programs, lifestyle modifications, willingness to undergo various treatment modalities, recovery time, survival, and quality of life. The findings underscore that individuals from lower socioeconomic and educational backgrounds experience significant barriers, including limited healthcare access, poor health awareness, delayed diagnosis, and reduced acceptance of standard treatments, leading to poorer outcomes. The study emphasises the necessity of targeted public health interventions, enhanced health education, and policy reforms to mitigate disparities and to improve cancer outcomes among vulnerable populations.
Keywords:
Socioeconomic disparities, educational factors, cancer prevention, Health literacy, Treatment Outcomes, Healthcare access barriers, public health interventionsDOI
https://doi.org/10.37022/wjcmpr.v8i1.378References
1. World Health Organization. Cancer [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; [cited 2026 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer
2. National Cancer Institute. Chromosome [Internet]. NCI Dictionary of Genetics Terms; [cited 2026 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/genetics-dictionary/def/chromosome
3. Sirin SR. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Rev Educ Res. 2005;75(3):417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417
4. Gupta B, Ariyawardana A, Johnson NW. Oral cancer in India continues in epidemic proportions: evidence base and policy initiatives. Int Dent J. 2013;63(1):12–25. doi:10.1111/j.1875-595X.2012.00131.x
5. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thara S, Muwonge R, Thomas G, Anju G, et al. Long-term effect of visual screening on oral cancer incidence and mortality in a randomized trial in Kerala, India. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(4):314–321. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.11.004
6. Desai S, Kulkarni V. Changing educational inequalities in India in the context of affirmative action. Demography. 2008;45(2):245–270. doi:10.1353/dem.0.0001
7. Ghosh SS. Assessing the Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Educational Equity in Indian Primary Schools: A Structural Modelling Perspective. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2024 Apr 5;1–11.
8. National Cancer Institute. Types of cancer A to Z list of cancer types [Internet]. [cited 2026 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/what-is-cancer
9. Cooper GM. The development and causes of cancer. In: The cell: a molecular approach. 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2000. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9963/
10. Mayo Clinic. Cancer: symptoms and causes [Internet]. [cited 2026 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cancer/symptoms-causes/syc-20370588
11. Neta G, Sanchez MA, Chambers DA, et al. Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions. Implement Sci. 2015;10:4. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0200-2
12. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):1–114. doi:10.3322/caac.2182
13. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2018 [cited 2026 Feb 11]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today
14. Lu W, Rosenthal DS. Oncology acupuncture for chronic pain in cancer survivors: a reflection on the American Society of Clinical Oncology chronic pain guideline. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2018;32(3):519–533. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2018.01.009
15. Linsinga ML, Singh B, Rose GL, Clifford BK, Bailey TG, Spence RR, et al. The effect of exercise on pain in people with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2023;53(9):1737–1752. doi:10.1007/s40279-023-01862-9
16. Goodlev ER, Discala S, Darnall BD, Hanson M, Petok A, Silverman M. Managing cancer pain, monitoring for cancer recurrence, and mitigating risk of opioid-use disorders: a team-based, interdisciplinary approach to cancer survivorship. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(11):1308–1317. doi:10.1089/jpm.2019.0171
17. Hamlish T, Pasquinelli M, Gastala N, Huber M, Manst D, Andersen K, et al. A team-based approach to effective management of pain and opioid use disorder in patients with cancer: Case report. Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Dec 3];8:100196
18. Ye L, Li YH, Huang YH, Deng QC, Huang YX, Peng YH, et al. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for pain management in patients with cancer:a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ open [Internet]. 2024 Jan;14(10)
19. Mathew A, George PS, Kunnambath R, Mathew BS, Kumar A, Syampramod R, et al. Educational status, cancer stage, and survival in South India: a population-based study. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:1704–1711. doi:10.1200/GO.20.00259
20. Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(11):1553–1568. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706
21. Tanskanen T, Seppä KJ, Virtanen A, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in the oldest old: a nationwide study in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(5):836–842. doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa236
22. Kerr J, Anderson C, Lippman SM. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and cancer: an update and emerging new evidence. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(8):e457–e471. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30411-4
23. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows. Public Health. 2021;199:20–24. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.009
24. Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, Soerjomataram I. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer. 2021;127(16):3029–3030. doi:10.1002/cncr.33587
25. Preda A, Voigt K. The social determinants of health: why should we care? Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(3):25–36. doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.998374
26. Dreyer MS, Nattinger AB, McGinley EL, et al. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4490-3
Published
Abstract Display: 45 
PDF Downloads: 49 How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
