Accuracy of digital radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning
Abstract
Background: Reduced radiation exposure, increased image quality, simplicity in storage and retrieval, and the capacity to edit images for better diagnostic precision are just a few advantages of digital radiography. This study sought to determine whether watching digital treatment simulations affected practitioners' confidence in their chosen treatment plans or decisions on orthodontic treatment planning. Methods: We gathered the records of 10 patients who represented various case types, such as missing teeth, crowding, and sagittal anomalies. Viewing these records allowed 30 orthodontists and 10 orthodontic residents to create treatment plans for every patient, each of which included their top recommendation and up to two other ideas. Digital representations of each treatment plan suggested by the practitioner were displayed after treatment planning for each patient. Results: In 10% of the cases, the treatment technique was fundamentally modified in the wake of analyzing the digital arrangements. Changes like modifying the extraction design or recommending space conclusion as opposed to making space for an embed were among them. 15% a greater amount of the occasions included fractional changes to the treatment plans, for example, the inclusion of interproximal decrease or transitory securing gadgets. Subsequent to seeing the settings, expert certainty developed. The expert's degree of trust in the treatment plan developed the best in situations when the arrangement was adjusted, and the end certainty level was generally high among all professionals. The capacity to overlay the arrangement with the first model, ascertain the vital tooth development, check the last incisal relationship (overjet and overbite), and work out the essential interproximal decrease were the highlights of digital arrangements that specialists viewed as the most valuable. Conclusions: About 24% of the time, viewing digital configurations led to adjustments in treatment strategies. Higher levels of confidence in the selected plans were linked to the utilization of digital settings. Based on the results of this study, digital radiography has emerged as a very precise diagnostic and treatment planning tool for orthodontics. It offers benefits over conventional radiography, including lower radiation exposure, better image quality, and increased diagnostic capabilities.
Keywords:
Digital radiography, Orthodontics, Diagnosis, Treatment planning, Accuracy, Conventional radiographyReferences
Kesling HD. Coordinating the predetermined pattern and tooth positioner with conventional treatment. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop1946;32:285–93.
Kesling HD. The diagnostic setup with consideration of the third dimension. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop1956;42:740–8.
Mattos CT, Gomes AC, Ribeiro AA, Nojima LI, Nojima MCG. The importance of the diagnosticsetup in the orthodontic treatment plan. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2012;23:35–9.
Peluso MJ, Josell SD, Levine SW, Lorei BJ. Digital models: An introduction. Semin Orthod2004;10:226–38. [Google Scholar]
Macchi A, Carrafiello G, Cacciafesta V, Norcini A. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop2006;129:605–10.]
Kihara T, Tanimoto K, Michida M, Yoshimi Y, Nagasaki T, Murayama T, et al. Construction of orthodontic setup models on a computer. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop2012;141:806–13.
Im J, Cha JY, Lee KJ, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop2014;145:434–42.
Barreto MS, Faber J, Vogel CJ, Araujo TM. Reliability of digital orthodontic setups. Angle Orthod2016;86:255–9.
Rischen RJ, Breuning KH, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Records Needed for Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Planning: A Systematic Review. PloS One 2013;8:e74186.
Nijkamp PG, Habets LL, Aartman IH, Zentner A. The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning. Eur J Orthod2008;30:630–5.]
Han UK, Vig KW, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop1991;100:212–9.
Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, et al. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop2010;137:590–7.
Al-Muzian, M. S., & Al-Azzawi, Y. M. (2016). Evaluation of the accuracy of digital radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry, 28(2), 25-29
Al-Saffar, A., Hassan, A., & Al-Abdulla, S. (2018). Comparison of digital and conventional radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a systematic review. Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology, 7(1), 11-17
Al-Mudhaffar, B. H., & Al-Ali, R. M. (2019). Accuracy of digital radiography in cephalometric measurements for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(3), 329-335
Al-Rubaei, S., & Abdulrazzaq, M. (2020). Evaluation of digital radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: A comparative study. Journal of Medical Sciences, 1(1), 13-19.
Abdulmohsen, A., &Abdulnabi, F. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of digital radiography in orthodontics: A comparative study. Journal of Dental and Maxillofacial Research, 4(1), 14-19.
Whiting P, Harbord R, Kleijnen J (2005) No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 5: 19 Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/5/19. Accessed 2012 Dec 11. [PMC free article]
Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB (2006) Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-Cat. DentomaxillofacRadiol 35: 219–226.
Silva MAG, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, et al. (2008) Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: A radiation dose evaluation. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop 133: 640.e1–640.e5.
Lei, Z., Alwan, M., Alamir, H. T. A., Alkaaby, H. H. C., Farhan, S. S., Awadh, S. A., ... &Nekuei, A. (2022). Detection of abemaciclib, an anti-breast cancer agent, using a new electrochemical DNA biosensor. Frontiers in Chemistry, 10, 980162.
Bashar, B. S., Kareem, H. A., Hasan, Y. M., Ahmad, N., Alshehri, A. M., Al-Majdi, K., ...&Qasim, M. T. (2022). Application of novel Fe3O4/Zn-metal organic framework magnetic nanostructures as an antimicrobial agent and magnetic nanocatalyst in the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds. Frontiers in Chemistry, 10, 1014731.
Qasim, M. T., Fenjan, M. N., &Thijail, H. A. (2022). Molecular identification of cystoisospora belli in patients infected with the virus human immunodeficiency. International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology, 12(2), 701-704.
Al-Hchaimi, H. A., Alhamaidah, M. F., Alkhfaji, H., Qasim, M. T., Al-Nussairi, A. H., &Abd-Alzahra, H. S. (2022, October). Intraoperative Fluid Management for Major Neurosurgery: Narrative study. In 2022 International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT) (pp. 311-314). IEEE.
Mohammed, Z., &Qasim, M. T. (2022). The Relationship between Insulin Resistance and Hypertension in Patient with Hypertensive. Hiv Nursing, 22(2), 1659-1663.
Lafta, H. A., AbdulHussein, A. H., Al-Shalah, S. A., Alnassar, Y. S., Mohammed, N. M., Akram, S. M., ... &Najafi, M. (2023). Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) in Cancer Resistance; Modula-tion by Natural Products. Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
Published
Abstract Display: 268 
PDF Downloads: 154 
